Category: Featured

There is no way to sugarcoat this.

Wisconsin was brutal to watch on offense last season.

Not mediocre.

Not inconsistent.

Brutal.

The Badgers averaged 12.8 points per game. They averaged only 253 yards per game. They averaged 3.3 yards per rush. They threw interceptions on almost 5% of their pass attempts.

And somehow, they won four games.

That may be the most Wisconsin stat imaginable, but it is not the good version of Wisconsin. This was not a team leaning on Ron Dayne, Montee Ball, Melvin Gordon, Jonathan Taylor or one of those classic offensive lines that made the program so easy to understand.

This was different.

Wisconsin did not have an identity.

That is the most alarming part.

The Badgers went 4-8 last season and 2-7 in the Big Ten. They have not won seven games in a season since 2020. They are 5-12 in Big Ten play over the last two years.

Now Luke Fickell enters a massive season.

The schedule gives Wisconsin a chance.

The defense still has enough to believe in.

But none of it matters if the offense looks anything like it did last year.

HEAD COACH

• Luke Fickell, entering year four at Wisconsin
• Wisconsin went 4-8 last season.
• The Badgers finished 2-7 in the Big Ten.
• Fickell is 17-21 at Wisconsin.
• Fickell is 80-46 as a college head coach.

This feels like the year Wisconsin has to show something.

It does not have to be a Big Ten title season. That is not the standard right now.

But the Badgers have to look like the Badgers again.

Or at least like a competent Big Ten team.

The last two seasons have been rough. Wisconsin is 5-12 in conference play over that span, and last year’s offense was among the worst in the country. For a program that spent decades with one of the clearest identities in college football, that is hard to process.

Wisconsin used to be easy to explain.

Big offensive line. Physical backs. Play-action. Tough defense. Special teams. Win the line of scrimmage. Make opponents hate playing you.

That was the brand.

Now the Badgers are trying to rebuild almost everything at once.

The offense has been completely reworked through the portal. The defense lost a ton of production but still has enough intriguing pieces. The schedule avoids some of the biggest monsters in the Big Ten.

So the question is simple.

Can Wisconsin take advantage?

QUARTERBACK

The likely answer at quarterback is Colton Joseph.

And if Wisconsin is going to fix the offense, he probably has to be the guy who changes the whole feel of it.

Joseph comes in from Old Dominion after throwing for 4,251 yards and 32 touchdowns last season. He also brings a major rushing element, with more than 1,600 career rushing yards and 24 rushing touchdowns.

That is the part that makes him interesting.

Wisconsin did not just need a quarterback who could complete safe throws. It needed a quarterback who could create something. It needed someone who could stress defenses. It needed someone who could help build an offense from the ground up.

Joseph gives the Badgers a different kind of option.

Now, the competition level changes.

Doing it at Old Dominion is not the same as doing it in the Big Ten. That does not mean he cannot translate. It just means Wisconsin cannot assume the numbers automatically follow him.

The other part of this is health.

Wisconsin has had a hard time keeping quarterbacks healthy under Fickell. That matters even more with Joseph because his legs are part of the appeal. You want him running enough to make defenses worry. You do not want him taking so many hits that the whole season gets thrown off course.

The Badgers need him upright.

They need him confident.

And they need him to give this offense something it did not have last year: life.

THE REST OF THE OFFENSE

The offense has been rebuilt.

There is really no other way to put it.

Wisconsin brought in transfer offensive linemen, transfer running backs and transfer receivers. That makes sense when the offense was as bad as it was last season.

You do not tweak that.

You overhaul it.

The returning pieces start with Chris Brooks Jr. at receiver and offensive linemen Colin Cubberly and Emerson Mandell. That is not a ton, but at least the Badgers have a few familiar names to build around.

The backfield is where things get interesting.

Abu Sama III comes in from Iowa State and should be the lead back. He has nearly 2,000 career rushing yards and 13 touchdowns, and he gives Wisconsin a legitimate option in a room that needed fresh energy.

Bryan Jackson comes in from USC, and Nate Palmer should also be involved.

That is important because Wisconsin cannot ask Joseph to be the entire run game. The Badgers need a real running back rotation. They need to be able to line up and run the ball again.

Not just because of nostalgia.

Because it is hard to win in the Big Ten when you average 3.3 yards per rush.

At receiver, Chris Brooks Jr. returns, and Eugene Hilton Jr. is also in the mix. Shamar Rigby comes in from Oklahoma State as another transfer option.

The receiver room does not need to be elite right away. But it does need to be better than last year. Wisconsin needs someone who can win outside, someone who can stretch the field, and someone who can make Joseph’s life easier.

The offensive line is probably the biggest swing factor.

Wisconsin brought in multiple transfers, but Cubberly and Mandell give the Badgers at least some continuity. If the line is average, the offense can improve a lot. If the line is bad, the new quarterback and new running backs may not matter enough.

That is the whole offensive story.

The pieces are different.

Now the results have to be different.

DEFENSE

The defense is the reason Wisconsin was not completely hopeless last season.

The Badgers allowed 21.6 points per game and 323.6 yards per game. Those are solid numbers, especially considering how little help they got from the offense.

But this unit has its own questions.

Only Matthew Jung is listed as a returning defensive starter. That is a scary number.

Still, the defense is not empty.

Mason Posa is back after a productive season at linebacker. Cooper Catalano is another young linebacker who should matter. Hammond Russell IV comes in from West Virginia to help the defensive line. Charles Perkins should also be part of that group. Marvin Burks Jr. comes in from Missouri after starting 13 games.

That is enough to build something.

The run defense was actually strong last year, ranking near the top 15 nationally. That has to remain the foundation. Wisconsin cannot afford to get soft up front while trying to rebuild the offense.

The pass defense is where things get more complicated.

Opponents completed almost 70% of their passes against Wisconsin last season. That is a problem. The Badgers did not give up a ton of yards overall, but they allowed too many easy throws.

They also did not take the ball away.

Wisconsin averaged only 0.5 takeaways per game, one of the worst marks in the country.

That is the difference between a good defense and a defense that actually wins games.

The Badgers were disciplined. They committed only 3.6 penalties per game and averaged just 30 penalty yards per game. That is excellent.

But discipline alone is not enough.

Wisconsin has to create more disruption. More sacks. More hurried throws. More interceptions. More fumbles. More short fields for an offense that badly needs help.

The defense should still be the better side of the ball.

But it probably has to be more than solid.

It has to be the stabilizer while the offense tries to figure itself out.

SCHEDULE

The schedule is the best thing Wisconsin has going for it.

That might sound strange because the Badgers open with Notre Dame in Green Bay, and that is obviously a massive challenge.

But after that?

There is a path.

Wisconsin hosts Western Illinois and Eastern Michigan after the Notre Dame game. Those have to be wins. Then the Badgers go to Penn State on Sept. 26 before hosting Michigan State on Oct. 3.

After the bye, Wisconsin goes to UCLA, hosts USC, goes to Iowa, hosts Rutgers, then plays back-to-back road games at Maryland and Purdue before finishing at home against Minnesota.

The important part is who is not on the schedule.

No Ohio State.

No Indiana.

No Oregon.

No Michigan.

No Washington.

That is a huge deal in this version of the Big Ten.

It does not make the schedule easy. Notre Dame is a monster opener. Penn State is a tough road game. Iowa on the road is never fun. USC is dangerous. Maryland and Purdue are road games in November.

But if Wisconsin was ever going to catch a break from the Big Ten schedule, this is it.

Four of the first five games are in the state of Wisconsin, counting the Notre Dame game in Green Bay. That gives the Badgers a chance to build confidence early.

The key is not wasting it.

If Wisconsin loses to Notre Dame, that is not the end of the world.

But Western Illinois and Eastern Michigan must be wins. Michigan State at home feels important. UCLA, Rutgers, Maryland, Purdue and Minnesota are the kinds of games Wisconsin has to view as winnable if it wants to get back to a bowl.

The schedule gives the Badgers a chance to overachieve.

Now they have to be good enough to take advantage.

OUTLOOK

Wisconsin is one of the weirdest teams in the Big Ten to project.

On one hand, last year was ugly.

The offense was one of the worst in the country. The quarterback play was not good enough. The run game was not Wisconsin-level. The defense did not take the ball away. The roster had to be rebuilt with transfers.

That is a lot.

On the other hand, the schedule is manageable, the defense should still have some real pieces, and Colton Joseph gives the offense a chance to look completely different.

That is the optimistic case.

Joseph brings a dual-threat skill set. Abu Sama III gives the backfield a proven runner. The transfer receivers give the passing game new options. The offensive line has been reworked. The defense still has enough talent to be solid.

If all of that comes together, Wisconsin can get back to a bowl.

Maybe even more.

The worst-case scenario is obvious too.

Joseph’s production does not translate cleanly. The offensive line remains a problem. The run game still cannot get going. The defense takes a step back after losing so many starters. And the Badgers waste the schedule break.

That would put even more pressure on Fickell.

Wisconsin will be better.

It almost has to be.

The offense cannot be that bad again. The schedule is too favorable to ignore. And there are enough transfer pieces to believe this team can at least find a functional identity.

A bowl game should be the goal.

With this schedule, it is absolutely possible.

And if Wisconsin gets there, Fickell buys himself some breathing room.

If not, the questions in Madison are going to get a lot louder.

Full disclosure: I use AI tools to format my research into an article encompassing all of the information.

There are normal quarterback storylines.

Then there is what Washington has dealt with this offseason.

Demond Williams Jr. was expected back. Then he entered the transfer portal. There was interest from major programs. Washington was reportedly not thrilled with how it all played out because of the NIL piece attached to his return. Then, after all of that, Williams ended up staying with the Huskies.

That is not a normal offseason.

It is also not something Washington can ignore.

The good news is simple: Williams is still a Husky.

And if Washington is going to make noise in the Big Ten, that is where the conversation starts.

The Huskies went 9-4 last season and 5-4 in the Big Ten. Jedd Fisch is entering year three, and Washington already feels like a program that can be dangerous in this new version of the league.

The question is whether the Huskies can become more than dangerous.

Can they become a real Big Ten title threat?

They have the quarterback.

They have offensive line continuity.

They had a top-15 scoring defense last season.

Now they have to prove they can beat the best teams on the schedule.

HEAD COACH

• Jedd Fisch, entering year three at Washington
• Washington went 9-4 last season.
• The Huskies finished 5-4 in the Big Ten.
• Fisch is 15-11 at Washington.
• Washington averaged 31.1 points per game last season.

Fisch has done a solid job.

That may sound like underselling it, but it is true. Washington had to deal with a difficult transition after the national title game run and the coaching change, then had to adjust to life in the Big Ten.

The Huskies have not fallen apart.

They have stayed competitive.

Now the next step is the hard one.

Washington averaged 31.1 points per game last season and 392 yards per game. The points were better than the yardage would suggest, which usually means the offense was efficient enough in key moments and got enough from its quarterback to finish drives.

The defense was the bigger surprise.

Washington allowed only 19.4 points per game and 319 yards per game. That put the Huskies near the top of the country in scoring defense, and it kept them in position to win most weeks.

That is a good formula.

The problem is the top of the league.

Washington was good enough to beat a lot of teams. It was not good enough against the best teams on the schedule. That is where this season has to change.

The Huskies do not need to become Ohio State or Oregon overnight.

But they do need to prove they belong in that next group.

And with Williams back, they have a chance.

QUARTERBACK

This is all about Demond Williams Jr.

He is one of the most established quarterbacks in the Big Ten.

Last season, Williams threw for 3,065 yards, 25 touchdowns and eight interceptions. He also brings a rushing element that makes Washington’s offense harder to defend.

The raw numbers are good.

The advanced numbers are even more interesting.

Williams completed about 75% of his passes from a clean pocket. When protected, he could pick teams apart. That is exactly what you want from a quarterback in this offense.

Even under pressure, he held up well. Williams completed about 56% of his throws under pressure with six touchdowns and only one interception.

That matters.

A lot of quarterbacks fall apart when the pocket gets messy. Williams did not. He stayed composed enough to make plays and did not turn pressure into disaster.

The deep-ball numbers also give Washington a real ceiling. Williams completed about 40% of his deep throws with nine touchdowns and four interceptions.

So what is the concern?

The biggest games.

Against Ohio State, Michigan and Oregon last season, Williams threw two touchdowns and five interceptions.

That does not mean he is not good.

Nobody was exactly lighting up those teams.

But if Washington wants to move from good to dangerous, Williams has to be better in those games. He cannot just beat the middle of the league. He has to give Washington a chance against the teams that can win the Big Ten.

The offseason drama is going to get talked about.

That is unavoidable.

But once the season starts, nobody will care if Washington is winning.

That is the reality.

If Williams plays well, it becomes a footnote.

If he struggles, it becomes part of the story again.

THE REST OF THE OFFENSE

Washington has enough around Williams to be interesting.

The receiver room starts with Dezmen Roebuck, who was a freshman All-American type of player last season. He had 42 catches for 560 yards and seven touchdowns, and he gives Williams a proven target who can continue to grow.

That is a big deal.

The Huskies also get Rashid Williams back after he battled injuries last season. If he is healthy, that gives Washington another receiver who can help stretch the field and take pressure off Roebuck.

At tight end, Decker DeGraaf is back after finishing with 327 receiving yards. That is a useful piece in this offense, especially for a quarterback who can extend plays and work the middle of the field.

The running back room has options, but it also has questions.

Quaid Carr is in the mix. Trey Cooley is in the mix. Washington has bodies there, but the Huskies need someone to take control of the job. Williams can run, but Washington does not want him to become the entire run game.

The offensive line may be the biggest reason for optimism.

Drew Azzopardi, Geirean Hatchett, Landen Hatchett and John Mills are all part of the projected group. That is a lot of continuity up front, and it matters because this team is at its best when Williams is protected.

If Washington keeps Williams clean, the offense can be efficient.

If the run game becomes more stable, the offense can become dangerous.

That is the next step.

The passing game is good enough.

Now the Huskies need the run game to make defenses respect both sides of the offense.

DEFENSE

The defensive numbers were strong last season.

Washington allowed 19.4 points per game and 319 yards per game. Opponents also ran the ball on only about 46% of their plays, one of the lower rates in the country.

That tells you teams did not just line up and push Washington around.

The question is whether the Huskies can repeat that level of defense with only a few returning starters.

The key returning names start up front with Elinneus Davis and on the edge with Jacob Lane. In the secondary, Alex McLaughlin is back as one of the key pieces.

Washington also brings in important transfers.

Darin Conley comes in from Ball State, and DeSean Watts comes in from Sacramento State. Those defensive line additions should help a group that needs more depth and more production.

At linebacker, Xe’ree Alexander and Jacob Manu are both back. That matters because even if the returning starter count looks low, there are still players on this defense who have played meaningful football at Washington.

The secondary also has some interesting pieces.

Emmanuel Karnley began his career with Fisch at Arizona and now comes over to Washington. Dylan Robinson started five games as a freshman. Rylon Dillard-Allen and McLaughlin give the Huskies more experience in the back end.

So the defense is not empty.

But it does have to prove it can stay near last year’s level.

That is not easy.

A top-15 scoring defense is hard to repeat. Washington does not need to be exactly that good again, but it cannot take a huge step back.

If the defense stays solid, Williams gives the Huskies a chance in almost every game.

If the defense slips, the schedule gets a lot tougher.

SCHEDULE

The schedule gives Washington a chance to start fast.

The Huskies open with Washington State, then host Utah State and Eastern Washington before opening Big Ten play at home against Minnesota.

That means the first four games are all very winnable.

Washington should expect to start strong.

Then the schedule gets real.

The Huskies go to USC on Oct. 3, then host Iowa on Oct. 10. That is a fascinating two-week stretch because those teams test you in completely different ways.

USC can score.

Iowa wants to drag you into a rock fight.

After Iowa, Washington goes to Purdue, then gets a bye before going to Nebraska on Halloween.

That road stretch matters.

Four of Washington’s final six games are away from home, and that is where the season gets tricky.

After Nebraska, Washington hosts Penn State, then goes to Michigan State. Then comes the brutal finish: Indiana at home on Nov. 21 and Oregon on the road on Nov. 28.

That is a tough way to end the year.

Indiana is the defending national champion. Oregon is one of the best teams in the country. And going to Autzen Stadium in the regular-season finale is not exactly a soft landing.

The interesting schedule note is that five of Washington’s first six games are at home, with the only road game being USC.

That gives the Huskies a chance to build a record.

But the back half will decide what kind of team this actually is.

If Washington is in good shape going into November, the Huskies could be one of the more dangerous teams in the Big Ten race.

If they stumble early, that closing stretch could become a problem.

OUTLOOK

Washington is one of the teams in the Big Ten that could swing a lot of different ways.

The optimistic case is strong.

Demond Williams Jr. is back. He is experienced, productive and efficient under pressure. Dezmen Roebuck gives him a young playmaker. Rashid Williams can help if healthy. Decker DeGraaf gives the offense a tight end piece. The offensive line has continuity. The defense was excellent last season and still has enough returning talent to be good.

That is a real case.

The concern is also real.

The offseason quarterback drama could become a distraction if things start poorly. The run game has to find a lead back. The defense has to replace important pieces. And the schedule ends with Indiana and Oregon, two games that could expose any weaknesses.

The best-case scenario is that Williams plays like one of the top quarterbacks in the Big Ten, Roebuck becomes a clear No. 1 receiver, the offensive line keeps the offense efficient, the run game settles, and the defense stays close to last year’s level.

If that happens, Washington can win nine or 10 games.

The worst-case scenario is that the quarterback story lingers, the offense becomes too dependent on Williams, the defense slips from top-15 level, and the late schedule knocks the Huskies down.

That is possible too.

If Washington is sitting there in November with only a couple losses, the whole league better pay attention.

Because with Williams at quarterback, the Huskies are good enough to ruin someone’s season.

And maybe good enough to make one of their own.

Full disclosure: I use AI tools to format my research into an article encompassing all of the information.

This feels like the year USC has to become more than interesting.

The Trojans have had moments under Lincoln Riley. They had the 11-3 season in 2022. They had Caleb Williams. They had the kind of offense that made USC feel dangerous again.

But the last three years have not matched the expectation.

USC has been stuck in that seven-to-nine-win range, which is not what people expected when Riley left Oklahoma for Los Angeles. The Trojans did not hire him to be pretty good. They hired him to put USC back in the national championship conversation.

Now, entering year five, the roster looks built for that kind of jump.

USC went 8-4 last season and 7-2 in the Big Ten. The Trojans averaged 35.8 points per game and 465 yards per game. They bring back more returning starters (15) than anyone in the country. They have a veteran quarterback. They have both top running backs back. They return the entire offensive line.

If USC is going to become elite under Riley, this feels like the year.

That does not mean it will be easy.

The schedule gets nasty.

But the roster is good enough to make this the most important season of Riley’s USC tenure.

HEAD COACH

• Lincoln Riley, entering year five at USC
• USC went 8-4 last season.
• The Trojans finished 7-2 in the Big Ten.
• Riley is 35-18 at USC.
• Riley is 90-28 as a college head coach.

This is not a “hot seat” year in the obvious sense.

Riley is too good of a coach for that.

But the pressure is absolutely building.

That is what happens when you are Lincoln Riley at USC. The expectations are different. The brand is different. The recruiting ceiling is different. The money is different. The spotlight is different.

Winning eight or nine games is not enough forever.

At some point, USC has to become a real Big Ten title contender.

The offense was already good enough last season. The Trojans averaged 35.8 points per game, which ranked near the top of the country. They averaged 465 yards per game, one of the best marks nationally. They were almost perfectly balanced, basically 50/50 run and pass.

That is what makes this team so interesting.

This is not just a throw-it-every-down Riley offense anymore. USC can run it. USC can throw it. USC can stress defenses in multiple ways.

The defense was better than some of Riley’s earlier USC teams too, allowing 23 points per game and 350 yards per game.

But better is not the same as good enough.

If USC wants to get into the top tier of the Big Ten, the defense still has to take another step.

That is the whole season.

The offense should be dangerous.

The defense has to become dependable.

QUARTERBACK

The quarterback is Jayden Maiava.

And this is where USC’s season really starts.

Maiava is 12-5 as a starter at USC. Last season, he completed 65% of his passes with 24 touchdowns and 10 interceptions.

Those are good numbers.

But the details are where the conversation gets more complicated.

Maiava threw an interception in eight of his final 10 games last season. Over that closing 10-game stretch, he had 15 touchdowns and 10 interceptions.

That has to be cleaner.

The talent is obvious. The arm is obvious. The deep ball is obvious. Maiava had the most deep-ball completions in the country last season with 39 completions of 20-plus air yards, according to PFF. He also ranked among the best nationally in deep-ball completion percentage.

That is a real weapon.

Not many quarterbacks can stretch the field like that.

But the pressure numbers matter too.

Maiava had the ninth-most pass attempts under pressure in the country, with pressure on about 41.9% of his dropbacks. That is too many. USC has to protect him better, especially with the entire offensive line coming back.

The good news is that the line should be better.

The bad news is that Maiava still has to make better decisions even when things are not perfect.

That is the next step.

If Maiava cuts down the interceptions and keeps the explosive passing game, USC can have one of the best offenses in the country.

If the late-season turnover trend continues, the Trojans will lose games they should not lose.

THE REST OF THE OFFENSE

There may not be a more experienced offense in college football.

That is not an exaggeration.

USC brings back almost everything.

The running back room should be a strength with King Miller and Waymond Jordan both returning. Miller rushed for 972 yards and eight touchdowns last season. Jordan added 576 yards and five touchdowns.

That gives USC two proven backs.

That matters because the Trojans were balanced last year, and they should be balanced again. Riley’s offense will always be known for quarterback play and explosive passing, but this team has enough in the backfield to punish defenses that play too light.

The receiver room is the bigger question.

Makai Lemon is gone to the NFL, and that is a major loss. He was a first-round type of player and one of the most dangerous pieces in the offense.

Now USC needs someone else to become the lead receiver.

Tanook Hines is the obvious returning name after catching 34 passes last season. He has a real chance to become a much bigger part of the offense.

The top newcomer to watch is Mark Bowman, a former five-star talent who could become one of the breakout players on the roster.

USC does not lack talent at receiver.

It just has to turn talent into production.

The offensive line is the part that should make USC fans feel best.

Alani Noa, Kilian O’Connor, Elijah Paige, Tobias Raymond and Justin Tauanuu are all part of a loaded returning group up front. In 2023, this unit had a ton of career starts. In 2024, USC had to rebuild it. Now the Trojans get continuity.

That is huge.

If the line takes a step, everything else works better.

Maiava gets cleaner pockets. The run game gets better lanes. The deep passing game gets more time to develop. The defense gets more rest.

This offense has everything it needs.

Now it has to be elite when the schedule gets real.

DEFENSE

The defense is why this season is fascinating.

USC was not terrible defensively last year.

The Trojans allowed 23 points per game and 350 yards per game, which is respectable. That is a long way from the worst of the Riley era.

But respectable is not enough to win the Big Ten.

USC still gave up too much in the biggest games. Oregon scored 42. Notre Dame scored 34. Illinois gave the Trojans problems too.

That is the difference between being good and being a playoff threat.

The good news is that USC has experience back.

Jide Abasiri returns up front. Kameryn Crawford and Braylan Shelby give the Trojans pass-rush pieces on the edge. Desman Stephens is back at linebacker. Christian Pierce and Marcelles Williams are back in the secondary.

That is a solid defensive core.

The question is whether USC has enough true difference-makers.

The Trojans have players. They have experience. They have depth. But they need someone on that defense to become a star. They need a pass rusher who changes games. They need a linebacker who cleans things up. They need defensive backs who can hold up against the best receivers in the league.

The defensive staff also matters.

With Gary Patterson involved, USC should be better organized. Patterson has been one of the best defensive minds in college football for a long time. If he can help bring more structure and consistency, this defense can improve quickly.

That is what USC needs.

Not just more talent.

More consistency.

More stops.

More toughness in the biggest games.

If the defense jumps from decent to good, USC becomes dangerous.

If it stays around the same level, the Trojans are probably still stuck in the eight-to-nine-win conversation.

SCHEDULE

The schedule gives USC a chance to start fast.

The Trojans open with three straight home games against San Jose State, Fresno State and Louisiana. Then they go all the way across the country to play Rutgers on Sept. 19.

USC should start 4-0.

That does not mean Rutgers is automatic. Cross-country travel is real, and Rutgers has several big-name home games this season. But USC has the better roster and should win that game.

Then everything changes.

Oregon comes to Los Angeles on Sept. 26.

One week later, Washington comes to USC on Oct. 3.

Those are measuring-stick games.

If USC is really going to be a top-tier Big Ten team, it has to win at least one of those and probably needs to defend home field in both.

Then the Trojans go to Penn State on Oct. 10.

That means USC plays seven straight games before its first bye.

That is a grind.

After the bye, USC goes to Wisconsin on Oct. 24, then hosts Ohio State on Halloween.

Then comes another bye before a trip to Indiana on Nov. 14.

That three-game stretch — at Wisconsin, Ohio State, at Indiana — is brutal.

It will define the season.

After that, USC hosts Maryland on Nov. 21 and finishes at UCLA on Nov. 28.

There are some weird Big Ten schedule notes here too.

USC has not been to Indiana since 1981. The Trojans have never hosted Maryland. The Rutgers trip is one of the longest road trips in the country.

That is life in the new Big Ten.

The key is getting through the first seven games in good shape.

If USC is 6-1 going into the first bye, everything is on the table.

If the Trojans stumble early, the back half could get uncomfortable fast.

OUTLOOK

This is the year.

That does not mean USC has to win the national championship.

But this is the year USC has to look like the program it is supposed to be under Lincoln Riley.

The pieces are there.

Jayden Maiava is experienced. King Miller and Waymond Jordan are back. The offensive line returns basically intact. The roster has more returning starters than anyone in the country. The defense has enough experience to improve. The schedule gives USC a manageable start before the brutal middle stretch.

The best-case scenario is that Maiava cuts down the interceptions, the offensive line becomes one of the best in the Big Ten, Miller and Jordan keep the offense balanced, Tanook Hines and Mark Bowman help replace Makai Lemon, and the defense makes a real jump under Patterson.

If that happens, USC can compete for the Big Ten title.

The worst-case scenario is that Maiava keeps turning it over, the receiver room does not replace Lemon quickly enough, and the defense is still not good enough against the best teams on the schedule.

If that happens, USC could be another eight- or nine-win team.

That would not be enough.

Not this year.

Not with this roster.

The talent is there.

The experience is there.

The pressure is there.

Now USC has to turn all of that into something bigger than another good-but-not-great season.

Full disclosure: I use AI tools to format my research into an article encompassing all of the information.

UCLA could not look much different than it did last year.

That is probably a good thing.

The Bruins went 3-9 last season and 3-6 in the Big Ten, and the one moment everyone remembers is the massive upset over Penn State. That win basically changed the direction of the Penn State program and helped end the James Franklin era there.

But for UCLA, it was more of a flash than a foundation.

The rest of the season was rough.

The offense struggled. The defense gave up too many points. The pass rush was almost nonexistent. The roster never looked deep enough to compete week after week in the Big Ten.

Now Bob Chesney takes over after a terrific run at James Madison, and the Bruins are trying to rebuild fast with a roster that has a very different feel.

There is one major piece back.

Nico Iamaleava.

And if UCLA is going to make a real jump, he has to be better.

HEAD COACH

• Bob Chesney, entering year one at UCLA
• UCLA went 3-9 last season.
• The Bruins finished 3-6 in the Big Ten.
• Chesney went 21-6 in two years at James Madison.
• James Madison reached the College Football Playoff under Chesney.

This is a really interesting hire.

Chesney won big at James Madison. He took a Group of Five program to the playoff, which is not something anyone should just brush off. James Madison was explosive on offense, tough on defense and extremely well coached.

Now he gets a Power Four job.

That changes everything.

At James Madison, Chesney could win with development, system, confidence and a roster that fit exactly what he wanted to do. At UCLA, the athlete level is higher, the resources are better and the brand is bigger.

But the schedule is also much harder.

That is the challenge.

UCLA averaged only 18.2 points per game last season, ranking near the bottom of the country. The Bruins averaged 320 yards per game, which was not much better. Opponents scored 33.4 points per game, even though they averaged only 387 yards per game.

That tells you UCLA was not just getting beaten.

It was getting put in bad situations.

Chesney’s James Madison team averaged 36.5 points per game and 452 yards per game last season. The Dukes also allowed only 19 points per game and 275 yards per game.

So the coaching track record is exciting.

The question is how fast it translates.

QUARTERBACK

Everything starts with Nico Iamaleava.

And this is one of the more fascinating quarterback situations in the Big Ten.

A couple years ago, Nico was one of the biggest names in the sport. He helped take Tennessee to the College Football Playoff, became one of the faces of the NIL era, left for UCLA, and then sort of faded from the national conversation.

That does not mean he cannot play.

He can.

But last season showed that UCLA cannot ask him to do everything.

Iamaleava completed 64% of his passes with 13 touchdowns and seven interceptions. He also ran for 505 yards and four touchdowns.

Those rushing numbers are good.

But they also tell part of the problem.

Too much of the offense was on him. UCLA did not have enough around him. The run game leaned too much on the quarterback. The passing game did not have enough explosive answers.

The deep-ball numbers were the biggest concern.

Iamaleava went 6-of-31 on deep throws with two touchdowns and one interception. That is a 19% completion rate, one of the worst marks in the country.

That has to change.

Some of it is on Nico. He has to be more accurate downfield. He has to give receivers chances. He has to make defenses pay when they crowd the short and intermediate game.

But some of it was also the roster.

UCLA did not have enough proven receivers. It did not have enough help in the run game. It did not have the kind of offensive line that allowed everything to function cleanly.

That is why Chesney and this new staff matter.

They have to give Nico an offense that helps him instead of asking him to save everything.

If they do, the Bruins can be much more competitive.

THE REST OF THE OFFENSE

The offense has a lot of new pieces, and most of them are connected to James Madison.

That makes sense.

Chesney knows those players. They know his system. If UCLA wants to improve quickly, bringing over players who already understand what the staff wants is logical.

The most important addition may be Wayne Knight.

Knight comes over from James Madison after rushing for 1,373 yards and nine touchdowns last season. That is exactly what UCLA needed.

A real running back.

A proven running back.

A back who can take pressure off Iamaleava.

The Bruins also have Jaivian Thomas and Anthony Woods, who both rushed for 294 yards last season. That gives UCLA more options in the backfield, and that matters because last year’s leading non-quarterback rusher is gone.

This offense cannot be Nico plus hope again.

The receiver room is also being rebuilt.

Landon Ellis comes over from James Madison. Leland Smith comes in from San Jose State. Brian Rowe comes in from South Carolina. That is a brand new group trying to replace a receiver room that did not bring back anyone with more than 500 yards from last season.

That is both concerning and exciting.

It is concerning because chemistry takes time.

It is exciting because UCLA needed something different.

The offensive line also gets help from James Madison.

Riley Robell, an All-Sun Belt type of player, comes over. Tackie Nd Raymond also comes from JMU. UCLA also has Eugene Brooks and Sam Yoon back up front.

That could be the difference.

If the line improves and Knight gives the Bruins a real run game, Iamaleava’s job changes completely. He can be a quarterback instead of the entire offense.

That is the goal.

DEFENSE

The defensive number that stands out is almost impossible to believe.

UCLA produced zero sacks last season.

Not few.

Zero.

That tells you everything about how much work this defense needs.

If you cannot sack the quarterback one time in a season, you cannot survive in the Big Ten. You are not creating negative plays. You are not speeding up quarterbacks. You are not getting offenses off schedule.

That has to be fixed immediately.

The Bruins do have some returning pieces in the secondary.

Scooter Jackson, Cole Martin and Rodrick Pleasant are all back. That gives UCLA experience on the back end, but the secondary can only hold up for so long if there is no pass rush.

That is why the transfers matter.

Sahir West comes over from James Madison as a defensive end. DJ Barksdale also comes in from James Madison in the secondary. Sammy Omosigho comes in from Oklahoma, and Tao Johnson comes in from Utah.

Those are important additions.

But the biggest thing is simple.

UCLA has to become more disruptive.

The Bruins do not need to turn into the 1985 Bears. They just need to make quarterbacks uncomfortable. They need to create sacks, tackles for loss, hurried throws and turnovers.

Chesney’s James Madison defense was outstanding last season. The Dukes allowed only 19 points per game and 275 yards per game.

If even some of that defensive identity travels to Los Angeles, UCLA will look very different.

But going from zero sacks to Big Ten competitive is not a small jump.

That is probably the biggest challenge on the roster.

SCHEDULE

The schedule does not give UCLA much time to ease into things.

Three of the first five games are on the road.

The Bruins open at Cal, then host San Diego State and Purdue. After that, they go to Maryland and Oregon.

That is a tough start.

Cal is a rivalry-type road game. Maryland is a long trip. Oregon is one of the best teams in the country.

So UCLA may be improved and still take some early punches.

The next stretch is where the season has to be made.

After Oregon, UCLA gets three straight home games against Wisconsin, Michigan State and Nevada.

That is the softest and most important part of the schedule.

If the Bruins want to push toward a bowl game, they need to win there. All three are at home. All three are games UCLA has to view as realistic opportunities.

Then comes the final month.

The Bruins go to Minnesota on Nov. 7, host Illinois on Nov. 14, go to Michigan on Nov. 21, and finish with USC at home.

That is not easy.

Michigan on the road is a major challenge. USC is the rivalry game. Illinois should be improved. Minnesota is a tough place to play in November.

The path to a bowl is there, but it is narrow.

San Diego State and Purdue need to be wins. UCLA probably needs to win at least two of Wisconsin, Michigan State, Nevada and Illinois. Then it has to steal something on the road.

That is asking a lot in year one.

But it is not impossible.

OUTLOOK

UCLA should be better.

I feel pretty confident about that.

The question is whether the record shows it right away.

That is a different conversation.

Bob Chesney is a really good coach. He proved that at James Madison. He brought over players who know his system. He has a quarterback with talent. He has a running back in Wayne Knight who can change the feel of the offense. He has a staff that should bring more structure and belief.

That is the optimistic case.

The concern is the roster gap.

UCLA was not just unlucky last season. The Bruins had major problems. They could not score enough. They could not protect the quarterback well enough. They did not have a consistent running game. They did not have a downfield passing game. They had zero sacks.

Those are not small fixes.

The best-case scenario is that Iamaleava plays like the quarterback people thought he could be, Knight gives UCLA a real run game, the James Madison transfers help the offense function quickly, and the defense finally creates pressure.

If that happens, UCLA can push toward a bowl.

The worst-case scenario is that Nico is still forced to do too much, the new receivers take time to settle, the defensive front still does not create pressure, and the early road schedule puts the Bruins behind before the rebuild has traction.

UCLA will look much better.

But the record may only be a little better.

This feels like a team that could improve by a lot in quality and only improve by a couple games in the standings. That happens when the schedule is difficult and the roster is being rebuilt.

Still, there is a real reason to believe.

Chesney has won everywhere he has been. He brings a clear identity. He brings players who know how he wants to play.

And if he can get the best out of Nico Iamaleava, UCLA becomes a lot more interesting.

Maybe not a Big Ten contender yet.

But a team nobody should just pencil in as an easy win anymore.

Full disclosure: I use AI tools to format my research into an article encompassing all of the information.

Greg Schiano is the reason Rutgers has had real football moments.

He is the coach who proved it was possible to win there. He is the coach most people still associate with the best stretch of Rutgers football. He is also the coach now trying to figure out how to make it happen again in a much different version of the Big Ten.

That is the hard part.

Rutgers went 5-7 last season and 2-7 in the Big Ten. The Scarlet Knights have not had a nine-win season since 2011, and Schiano is now entering year seven of his second stint.

The question is not whether Schiano knows how to win at Rutgers.

The question is whether the league has gotten too difficult for Rutgers to take the kind of step fans want.

The expanded Big Ten is brutal. There are more national brands. More travel challenges. More playoff-level teams. And Rutgers is still trying to move from the bottom tier into the middle of the league.

The good news is that the offense has real pieces.

The bad news is that the defense was a mess last season.

That is where the season starts.

HEAD COACH

• Greg Schiano, entering year seven of his second stint at Rutgers
• Rutgers went 5-7 last season.
• The Scarlet Knights finished 2-7 in the Big Ten.
• Schiano is 99-108 at Rutgers.

Schiano’s second stint has not matched the first one.

There have been moments. Rutgers had back-to-back 7-6 seasons before slipping to 5-7 last year. That matters because, at Rutgers, bowl seasons are not automatic. You take them when you get them.

But the Scarlet Knights are still trying to become more than just a team that occasionally gets to six wins.

Last season started with some promise. Rutgers opened 3-0, then things got away from them. After that start, the only wins came by three points at Purdue and against a Maryland team that completely collapsed.

That is not enough.

Rutgers averaged 25.8 points per game and 393.5 yards per game last season. Those numbers are fine. Not great, but fine.

The run game was the bigger issue.

Rutgers ran the ball on 52% of its plays, but averaged only 3.6 yards per carry. That has to be better, especially with the running back they have.

The defense was the real problem.

Rutgers allowed 33.8 points per game and 452.5 yards per game. That is not Big Ten competitive. The Scarlet Knights also finished with only 11 sacks, one of the lowest totals in the country.

If that does not change, nothing else matters.

QUARTERBACK

The quarterback battle looks like Dylan Lonergan against AJ Surace.

Lonergan is the bigger name and probably the favorite.

He comes in from Boston College after starting his career at Alabama, and he brings real Power Four experience. Last season, he completed 66.9% of his passes for 2,025 yards, 12 touchdowns and five interceptions.

Those numbers are solid.

But the season was not perfectly smooth. Lonergan was in and out of the lineup at times at Boston College, so Rutgers is not getting a guaranteed star. It is getting a talented quarterback who has already been through a lot and now gets another chance.

That can work.

Sometimes a change of scenery is exactly what a quarterback needs.

Surace is the other option. He threw only nine passes last season, completing four for 58 yards and two touchdowns. All of his completions came against Norfolk State, so there is not much of a sample here.

That makes this decision interesting.

Lonergan has the experience.

Surace has the program familiarity.

THE REST OF THE OFFENSE

This is where Rutgers has its best argument for being better than people think.

Start with KJ Duff.

Duff had 60 catches for 1,084 yards and seven touchdowns last season. He is 6-foot-6, wins contested catches, and led the nation with 22 contested catches, according to Athlon Sports.

That is a weapon.

A real one.

If you are breaking in a new quarterback, a receiver like Duff makes everything easier. He does not have to be wide open. He can win in traffic. He can be the answer on third down. He can bail you out when the throw is not perfect.

That matters a lot.

Then there is Antwan Raymond.

Raymond rushed for more than 1,200 yards and 13 touchdowns last season. He is one of only a handful of running backs in Rutgers history to produce a 1,200-yard season.

That should be the identity.

Rutgers has to run the ball better. It has the running back to do it. The issue is that the overall rushing efficiency was not good enough last season.

A great back should not be stuck in a run game averaging 3.6 yards per carry.

The offensive line has some pieces back with Kwabena Asamoah and Tyler Needham. That is important because this offense cannot just ask Raymond to create everything by himself. He needs cleaner lanes. The quarterback needs better protection. The whole unit has to be more physical.

The passing game also needs more than Duff.

He is good enough to be the clear No. 1, but if defenses can roll coverage his way every week, somebody else has to punish them.

That is where the development of the rest of the receiver room matters.

But the foundation is not bad.

A proven running back. A 1,000-yard receiver. Two experienced offensive linemen. A quarterback transfer with real starting experience.

That is enough to work with.

Now Rutgers has to turn it into points.

DEFENSE

This is the side that decides the season.

Rutgers was not just bad defensively last year.

It was bad in the ways that are hardest to survive in the Big Ten.

The Scarlet Knights allowed 33.8 points per game. They gave up 452.5 yards per game. Opponents averaged nearly nine yards per pass attempt, one of the worst marks in the country.

And the pass rush was almost nonexistent.

Only 11 sacks all season.

That is the number that jumps off the page.

You cannot play Big Ten football that way. Not anymore. Not with the quarterbacks and receivers in this league. If you cannot affect the passer, good teams are going to carve you up.

That is why the transfer additions matter.

Rutgers brought in help all over the defense.

Malachi Davis comes in from Toledo. J’Dan Burnett Sr. comes in from Tulsa. Ty Morris comes in from Rice. Zahmir Dawud comes in from Villanova. Kevyn Humes Jr. comes in from Boston College.

Those are the kinds of additions Rutgers needed.

Up front, Zaire Angoy and Keshon Griffin are important pieces. At linebacker, Abram Wright Jr. is back after finishing with 58 tackles. In the secondary, Kaj Sanders Jr. is the leading returning tackler after making 65 tackles last season.

There are names here.

Now there has to be production.

The defense does not need to become elite overnight. That is not realistic. But Rutgers cannot be near the bottom of the country in pass defense again. It cannot finish with only 11 sacks again. It cannot keep giving up 34 points and expect to win Big Ten games.

This team’s bowl hopes depend on the defense becoming functional.

If the defense is average, Rutgers can be competitive.

If it is bad again, the offense probably cannot save it.

SCHEDULE

Rutgers opens at home against UMass, then goes to Boston College on Sept. 11. That Boston College game has an obvious storyline if Lonergan is the quarterback against his former team.

After that, things get real quickly.

The Scarlet Knights host USC on Sept. 19, then Howard on Sept. 25, then Indiana on Oct. 3.

That means four of the first five games are at home.

That is good.

But two of those home games are USC and Indiana.

That is not good.

USC brings back a ton. Indiana is the defending national champion. Rutgers gets both in New Jersey, which matters, but those are still enormous tests.

After a bye, Rutgers goes on the road for back-to-back games at Maryland and Northwestern. Those games may define the season. If Rutgers wants to get to a bowl, it probably has to win at least one of those and maybe both.

Then Michigan comes to Rutgers on Halloween.

After that, the Scarlet Knights go to Wisconsin, host Nebraska, go to Penn State, and finish at home against Michigan State.

There are opportunities.

UMass and Howard have to be wins. Boston College is a big swing game. Maryland and Northwestern are road games, but they are not impossible. Michigan State at home could matter late.

The problem is the ceiling games.

USC, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nebraska and Penn State all present real challenges. Rutgers gets several of the biggest names at home, which helps. But the schedule still does not give the Scarlet Knights many free spots.

If Rutgers is going to make a bowl, it has to win the toss-up games.

There is no other path.

OUTLOOK

I understand the case for Rutgers being better than people expect.

The offense has real pieces. KJ Duff is one of the best receivers in the Big Ten. Antwan Raymond is a proven 1,200-yard back. Dylan Lonergan gives the quarterback room a legitimate transfer option, if he starts .The offensive line has some experience.

That is the optimistic case.

The concern is the defense.

It was too bad last year to ignore. Rutgers could not rush the passer. It could not stop teams from throwing it efficiently. It gave up too many points. It let games get away.

The best-case scenario is that Lonergan wins the quarterback job and gives Rutgers stable passing-game play, Duff becomes one of the league’s best receivers again, Raymond carries the run game, and the defensive transfers immediately raise the floor.

If that happens, Rutgers can get back to a bowl.

The worst-case scenario is that the quarterback battle lingers, the run game remains inefficient despite Raymond’s talent, and the defense still cannot create pressure.

If that happens, Rutgers could be stuck near the bottom again.

The goal should be simple.

Beat the teams you are supposed to beat.

Steal one home game against a bigger name.

Win a road toss-up.

Get back to a bowl.

That would be a good season.

Anything more than that probably depends on whether the defense can make a jump nobody saw coming.

Full disclosure: I use AI tools to format my research into an article encompassing all of the information.

There are struggling programs.

Then there is Purdue.

That sounds harsh, but there is no way to look at the last two years and pretend this has been normal.

The Boilermakers went 2-10 last season. They finished 0-9 in the Big Ten. They have not won a Big Ten game in two years. They have not had a winning record since 2022. They have not had a 10-win season since 1979.

That is a long drought.

And the problem is not just that Purdue has been losing.

It is how the games have looked.

The Boilermakers averaged only 17.4 points per game last season. They gave up 33.2 points per game. Opponents averaged 436 yards per game and ran the ball on almost 60% of their plays.

That tells you what the season looked like.

Teams got ahead.

Teams ran the ball.

Teams put Purdue away.

Now Barry Odom enters year two, and the first goal is simple – Be competitive again.

HEAD COACH:

• Barry Odom, entering year two at Purdue
• Purdue went 2-10 last season.
• The Boilermakers finished 0-9 in the Big Ten.
• Purdue has not had a winning record since 2022.

Odom inherited a tough job.

This was not a quick-fix situation. Purdue had slipped badly, and the Big Ten is not getting easier. Oregon, USC, UCLA and Washington are in the league now. The middle of the conference is deeper. The top of the conference is loaded.

That makes rebuilding harder.

But year two still has to look different.

Purdue does not need to suddenly become a Big Ten contender. That is not realistic. But the Boilermakers need to look organized. They need to look tougher. They need to stop getting pushed around. They need to stop watching games get away from them in the second half.

The offense averaged 339 yards per game, which is not good, but it was not completely hopeless. The scoring was the bigger issue.

The defense was the bigger problem.

When you allow 33 points and 436 yards per game, the offense has to chase. When the offense has to chase, the quarterback gets put in bad spots. When the quarterback gets put in bad spots, turnovers and empty possessions follow.

That is how a bad team stays bad.

Odom has to break that cycle.

QUARTERBACK

The best news for Purdue is that Ryan Browne is back.

That does not mean everything is fixed.

But it does give the Boilermakers an experienced quarterback in a year when a lot around him is changing.

Browne completed 58.9% of his passes last season for 2,153 yards, nine touchdowns and 10 interceptions. For his Purdue career, he has 13 touchdowns and 14 interceptions.

Those numbers are not good enough.

But he has played. He has taken Big Ten snaps. He has seen what this league looks like. On a team trying to climb out of the basement, that matters.

The question is whether experience turns into improvement.

Browne did not throw multiple touchdown passes in a Big Ten game last season. He went 12-of-40 on deep balls with four touchdowns and two interceptions. In a clean pocket, he completed about 66% of his passes, but still had six touchdowns and six interceptions.

That is the part that has to change.

When Purdue protects him, Browne has to reward the offense with better decisions.

Under pressure, the numbers were rough. Browne completed 38.9% of his passes with three touchdowns and four interceptions.

That is where defenses could really squeeze Purdue.

Pressure him, force him off schedule, make him play fast, and the offense struggled.

So this season is about two things.

Purdue has to protect him better.

Browne has to be better when he is protected.

If both happen, the offense can improve.

If neither happens, this is going to look too much like last year.

THE REST OF THE OFFENSE

The offense has to replace Devin Mockobee.

Mockobee had been the steady piece in the Purdue backfield for years. Now the Boilermakers have to rebuild the running game with transfers and new roles.

Jerrick Gibson comes in from Texas. Fame Ijeboi comes in from Minnesota after rushing for 441 yards on 97 carries last season. Travis Terrell also comes in from Jackson State.

That gives Purdue options.

Now one of them has to become the guy.

The Boilermakers passed on 55% of their plays last season, and a lot of that was because they were behind. They cannot live that way again. They need a run game that keeps them out of obvious passing situations and keeps Browne from having to carry the whole offense.

At receiver, Purdue hit the portal hard.

Bisi Owens comes in from Penn. Asaad Waseem comes in from Florida Atlantic. Xavier Townsend comes in from Iowa State. De’Nylon Morrissette also returns after being part of the receiver group last season.

That room is new.

But new is not automatically bad.

Purdue needed more playmaking. It needed more separation. It needed more explosiveness. The Boilermakers could not keep relying on the same formula and expecting a different result.

The offensive line also has a lot of moving parts.

Joey Tanona and Ethan Trent are the returning starters, and Purdue added multiple offensive linemen through the portal to rebuild the group.

That may be the most important position group on the team.

If the line improves, Browne improves. If Browne improves, the receivers have a chance. If the running game improves, the defense gets more rest.

Everything starts there.

DEFENSE

The defense has to be dramatically better.

There is no other way to say it.

Purdue gave up 33.2 points per game and 436 yards per game last season. Opponents ran the ball on 59% of their plays, which shows how often Purdue was playing from behind and how little resistance the defense gave once teams decided to lean on the run.

That cannot happen again.

The returning pieces start with Ian Jeffries, CJ Madden, Charles Correa and Hudauri Hines.

Correa is the big name.

He is back after a 96-tackle season, and Purdue needs him to be the tone-setter. On a defense that got pushed around too often, having a productive linebacker back matters.

The portal additions could be important too.

Elo Modozie comes in from Georgia, and Keyshawn Burgos comes in from Virginia Tech. Those are Power Four defensive line additions, and Purdue needs them to matter immediately.

This team has to be better up front.

It has to force more uncomfortable downs. It has to stop allowing teams to run the ball whenever they want. It has to create more negative plays.

At linebacker, Anthony Speca comes in from Penn State, and Jojo Hayden comes in from Illinois. Those additions should help a defense that needed more physicality and depth.

In the secondary, Smiley Bradford and Hudauri Hines are back.

But the secondary can only do so much if the front is not better.

Purdue’s defense does not have to become great overnight.

It just has to stop being the reason games are over early.

SCHEDULE

The schedule is not impossible.

But it is not easy either.

Purdue opens with Indiana State at home, then hosts Wake Forest. After that, the Boilermakers go to UCLA, then host Notre Dame on Sept. 26.

That Notre Dame game is a monster.

The Irish may be one of the best teams in the country, and Purdue will have to deal with them early. But the first month still gives the Boilermakers a chance to start better than last year.

Three of the first four games are at home.

Five of the first seven are at home.

That matters for a team trying to rebuild confidence.

After Notre Dame, Purdue goes to Illinois, then hosts Minnesota and Washington. After a bye, the Boilermakers go to Penn State on Halloween.

Then comes the final month: Maryland at home, Iowa on the road, Wisconsin at home and Indiana on the road.

There are a few interesting schedule notes.

Purdue does not play Ohio State, Oregon or Michigan.

That helps.

But the Boilermakers still have Notre Dame, Penn State, Iowa and Indiana away from home or in tough spots. Three of the final five games are on the road: at Penn State, at Iowa and at Indiana.

That is a tough finish.

The path to improvement probably has to come early.

Indiana State has to be a win. Wake Forest is important. Minnesota, Maryland and maybe one of the other home games have to be real targets.

If Purdue is still searching for confidence by November, the back end of the schedule could be rough.

OUTLOOK

This is a hard preview to write because the optimism has to be realistic.

Purdue can be better.

That does not mean Purdue is going to be good.

The Boilermakers have an experienced quarterback in Ryan Browne. They have a new running back group with Jerrick Gibson, Fame Ijeboi and Travis Terrell. They added receivers. They added offensive linemen. They added defensive front-seven pieces from bigger programs.

That is the positive case.

The concern is everything else.

The offense could not score enough last season. Browne threw more interceptions than touchdowns. The defense got gashed. Opponents ran the ball whenever they wanted. Purdue has not won a Big Ten game in two years.

Those are not small problems.

The best-case scenario is that Browne becomes more efficient, the new running backs give Purdue real balance, one or two transfer receivers become reliable targets, and the defense gets immediate help from Modozie, Burgos, Speca and Hayden.

If that happens, Purdue can be more competitive.

It can finally get a Big Ten win.

Maybe it can push toward four or five wins if things break right.

The worst-case scenario is that the quarterback numbers stay the same, the line still struggles, the run game never settles, and the defense remains too easy to run on.

If that happens, this could be another long season.

Full disclosure: I use AI tools to format my research into an article encompassing all of the information.

Things feel a lot different at Penn State.

For years, the conversation around the Nittany Lions was simple.

When is James Franklin going to win the big one?

That question is gone now.

Not because Penn State won the big one.

Because Franklin is gone.

Matt Campbell is now the head coach. Rocco Becht is now the quarterback. A huge chunk of the Iowa State roster followed Campbell to State College. This is not just a normal coaching change.

This feels like a program reset.

Penn State went 7-6 last season and 3-6 in the Big Ten, and the year never came close to matching the preseason expectations. The Nittany Lions started with playoff hopes, but injuries, inconsistency and a shocking loss to UCLA changed everything.

Now the program looks completely different.

New coach.

New quarterback.

New offensive identity.

New defensive pieces.

Same expectations.

That is the hard part.

HEAD COACH

• Matt Campbell, entering year one at Penn State
• Penn State went 7-6 last season.
• The Nittany Lions finished 3-6 in the Big Ten.
• Campbell went 72-55 at Iowa State.
• Penn State has only a few true returning starters from last year’s team.

This is one of the most fascinating hires in the Big Ten.

Campbell did a strong job at Iowa State. That is a hard place to win, and he turned the Cyclones into a program that could be competitive in the Big 12. He developed players. He built toughness. He won enough to become a major name for bigger jobs.

Now he gets one.

Penn State is not Iowa State.

That cuts both ways.

The resources are bigger. The recruiting ceiling is bigger. The fan base is bigger. The brand is bigger.

But the expectations are bigger too.

At Iowa State, being competitive mattered. At Penn State, being competitive is not enough. This program expects to win big. It expects to compete for the playoff. It expects to matter nationally.

That is why this year is so interesting.

Campbell did not come alone. He brought a lot of familiar players with him, especially on offense. That gives Penn State more continuity than most first-year coaching staffs would have.

But it also raises the question.

Is this Penn State with Iowa State pieces?

Or is this Iowa State wearing Penn State uniforms?

That may sound harsh, but it is the real question.

The Big Ten schedule is different. The weekly physicality is different. The expectations are different. Campbell has to prove that the system can scale up in a tougher environment.

QUARTERBACK

The quarterback is Rocco Becht.

That gives Penn State a very clear identity right away.

Becht is not some untested transfer. He has played a ton of college football. He has thrown more than 1,000 career passes and has 64 touchdowns with 27 interceptions in his college career.

That experience matters.

He is not going to walk into a Big Ten road game and look overwhelmed by the moment. He has been in close games. He has run Campbell’s offense. He knows what the staff wants.

That is the good part.

The numbers also show why there are questions.

Becht completed about 60.7% of his career passes at Iowa State. Last year, he ranked only 58th nationally in total pass attempts and 92nd in completion percentage. That is not elite efficiency.

The pressure numbers are the bigger concern.

He was under pressure on about 40% of his throws last season, and in those situations, he threw zero touchdowns and four interceptions. He also completed only 36% of his deep balls, going 16-of-44 with six touchdowns and two picks.

That is the line between solid and special.

Penn State does not need Becht to become the best quarterback in the country. But it does need him to be better than simply functional. If the Nittany Lions want to push toward the top of the Big Ten, Becht has to create enough explosives and avoid the mistakes that can kill drives.

He can keep Penn State in games.

The question is whether he can win the games Penn State has been trying to win for years.

That is a very different standard.

THE REST OF THE OFFENSE

The offense has a lot of Iowa State flavor.

That is not necessarily a bad thing.

Start at running back.

Quinton Martin Jr. gives Penn State one returning option after rushing for 103 yards as a freshman in the Pinstripe Bowl against Clemson. He is one of the few Penn State offensive pieces who was already in the program and still figures to matter.

Then comes the Iowa State connection.

Carson Hansen comes over after rushing for more than 1,700 yards and 19 touchdowns with the Cyclones. He should be a major part of the offense right away.

James Peoples also comes in from Ohio State, giving the backfield another talented option.

That should be a good room.

It has to be.

Campbell’s teams have generally wanted to run the ball, and Penn State ran it on 57% of its plays last season. The Nittany Lions threw only about 25.7 passes per game, so this offense is probably still going to lean on the ground game and the tight ends.

Speaking of tight ends, that might be the most interesting part of the roster.

Benjamin Brahmer and Gabe Burkle both followed Campbell from Iowa State. Those two were major pieces of the Cyclones’ passing game, and they give Becht immediate familiarity. That matters a lot.

A quarterback changing schools with his tight ends is not normal.

Penn State also brings in Chase Sowell and has Brett Eskildsen in the receiver mix. Again, there is a lot of Iowa State carryover here.

The offensive line has to come together.

Anthony Donkoh is the one returning starter up front, and that is a good piece to have. Malachi Goodman and Trevor Buhr are also expected to factor in after coming in as transfers.

The concern is whether this group can be physical enough quickly.

Penn State scored 29 points per game last season, but the offense averaged only 353 yards per game. That is not good enough if the goal is to compete at the top of the Big Ten.

The Iowa State offense last season averaged fewer points than Penn State, but more yards.

So the question is simple.

Can Campbell’s offense become more explosive with Penn State talent?

If the answer is yes, this team becomes very interesting.

If the answer is no, Penn State may still feel stuck in the same place — just with different people.

DEFENSE

This side of the ball is basically being rebuilt too.

Penn State does have a couple of important returning pieces in the secondary.

Audavion Collins is back. So is Zion Tracy.

Those two give the Nittany Lions at least some continuity on the back end, and that matters when so much else is changing.

But the defense also has a heavy Iowa State influence.

The top four tacklers from Iowa State transferred to Penn State. That is wild. It also tells you how much Campbell believed in bringing the core of his program with him.

Kooper Ebel comes in at linebacker. Caleb Bacon is also part of the defensive front-seven picture. Tony Rojas gives Penn State a familiar linebacker name from last year’s roster, and he should be one of the key pieces in the middle of the defense.

In the secondary, Marcus Neal Jr. comes over after earning All-Big 12 recognition at Iowa State.

That is not just depth.

That is real production.

Penn State also added multiple defensive tackles through the portal, clearly trying to get bigger and stronger up front. That has to work because the Big Ten will test you there every week.

The comparison point is interesting.

Iowa State allowed 21.4 points per game and 370 yards per game last season. That is solid. Penn State’s defense was better in yardage allowed last year, giving up 326 yards per game, but this is not the same roster anymore.

So the question is not really what Penn State did last year.

The question is whether Campbell’s defensive core can translate.

Can Iowa State’s best tacklers become Big Ten answers?

Can Penn State’s returning defensive backs help hold everything together?

Can the transfer defensive tackles make the front sturdy enough?

There is enough talent here to be good.

But there is enough new here to be nervous.

SCHEDULE

The schedule is the biggest reason to believe Penn State can start fast.

The Nittany Lions open with Marshall at home, then go to Temple on Sept. 12. After that, they host Buffalo and Wisconsin.

That means three of the first four games are at home.

The Temple game is interesting because it is on the road, and I always like when a Power Four program is willing to go play a Group of Five team away from home. Temple has gotten some big programs to do that, and Penn State is one of them.

After Wisconsin, Penn State goes to Northwestern on Oct. 2.

So the first five games are Marshall, Temple, Buffalo, Wisconsin and Northwestern.

Penn State fans are going to expect 5-0.

They should.

That does not mean it will be automatic, but if this team wants to be taken seriously in the Big Ten, that is the start it needs.

Then comes the real test.

USC comes to Beaver Stadium on Oct. 10.

That is a massive game. It is a long trip for the Trojans, and it should be one of the first real measuring-stick moments for Campbell’s new team.

One week later, Penn State goes to Michigan.

That back-to-back stretch will tell us a lot.

After a bye, the Nittany Lions host Purdue on Halloween, go to Washington, then host Minnesota and Rutgers before finishing at Maryland.

The schedule is favorable in one major way.

Penn State does not play Ohio State, Oregon or Indiana.

That is a huge deal.

In this version of the Big Ten, avoiding those three teams matters. The Nittany Lions still have USC, Michigan and Washington, but they miss the top of the league.

That gives Penn State a real chance to outperform expectations if the new roster comes together quickly.

OUTLOOK

I understand why people are split on Penn State.

On one hand, this is a major reset.

New coach. New quarterback. New offense. New defensive core. New identity. A roster that looks like a Penn State-Iowa State hybrid.

That is a lot to process.

On the other hand, this is not a normal reset with no continuity.

Campbell brought his quarterback. He brought his tight ends. He brought key defenders. He brought players who already know what he wants. That can speed things up.

The best-case scenario is that Rocco Becht gives Penn State steady quarterback play, Carson Hansen and Quinton Martin Jr. power a strong run game, Benjamin Brahmer and Gabe Burkle become safety blankets in the passing game, and the Iowa State defensive transfers immediately raise the floor.

If that happens, Penn State can be a top-25 team and maybe more.

The worst-case scenario is that the offense looks too much like Iowa State’s offense, Becht is only average against Big Ten pressure, the line takes time to settle, and the defense is not as strong as it was under the old version of Penn State.

That is possible too.

If Campbell can pair his system with Penn State’s resources, this can work.

Maybe quickly.

But the USC-Michigan stretch is where we find out.

Start 5-0, split those two, and Penn State becomes one of the more interesting stories in the Big Ten.

Lose early, look clunky, and people will start wondering whether this is a rebuild that needs more time.

Either way, Penn State is different now.

And different might be exactly what this program needed.

Full disclosure: I use AI tools to format my research into an article encompassing all of the information.

There may not be a better “so close” team in college football than Oregon.

The Ducks have been right there.

They are 17-1 in Big Ten play over the last two seasons. Their only losses the last two years came to the last two national champions: Ohio State two years ago and Indiana last season.

Oregon has not been exposed. It has not been falling short against average teams. It has not been losing random games it has no business losing.

The Ducks have been elite.

They have just run into the one team that ended up winning the whole thing.

At some point, though, that has to turn into a title.

That is the standard now.

Dan Lanning has built one of the best rosters in the country. Oregon has the quarterback. It has the receivers. It has the running backs. It may have the best defensive line in college football. It has one of the most talented secondaries in the Big Ten.

There is no reason to be shy about the expectation.

Oregon can win the national championship.

Now the Ducks have to actually do it.

HEAD COACH

• Dan Lanning, entering year five at Oregon
• Oregon went 13-2 last season.
• The Ducks finished 8-1 in the Big Ten.
• Oregon is 17-1 in Big Ten play over the last two seasons.
• Lanning is 48-8 in four years at Oregon.

This is where the conversation around Lanning gets interesting.

There is no hot seat. There should not be a hot seat. That would be ridiculous.

He is 48-8 at Oregon. The Ducks are recruiting at an elite level. They have transitioned into the Big Ten without blinking. They have been one of the most consistent programs in the country.

But when you are this good, the questions change.

It is no longer, “Can Oregon compete?”

Of course Oregon can compete.

It is no longer, “Can Oregon handle the Big Ten?”

The Ducks have already answered that.

The question is whether Oregon can win the final game.

That is the only thing missing.

The offense averaged 35 points per game last season and 448 yards per game. The defense allowed only 18.2 points per game and 275 yards per game.

Those are championship-level numbers.

The roster is loaded again.

That is why anything short of being in the national title conversation would feel like a disappointment.

QUARTERBACK

The quarterback is Dante Moore.

That alone puts Oregon in the national championship conversation.

Moore completed 71.8% of his passes last season with 30 touchdowns and 10 interceptions. He has the kind of arm talent and pedigree that makes NFL people pay attention, and he may be one of the top quarterbacks in the country going into the season.

But this is not about whether he can play.

He can play.

The question is whether he can clean up the moments that kept Oregon from being even better.

In Oregon’s toughest games last season — Texas Tech, two games against Indiana, and the rainy road game at Iowa — Moore threw three touchdowns and five interceptions.

In the other games, he threw 27 touchdowns and five interceptions.

That is the next step.

Oregon does not need Moore to dominate the teams the Ducks already outclass. It needs him to be at his best when the opponent has the athletes to make him uncomfortable.

Moore completed 75% of his passes in a clean pocket, but still threw seven interceptions in those situations. That is the part that has to improve. When he has time, when he can read it, when he has this much talent around him, he has to make the boring play if the big one is not there.

Under pressure, Moore completed 57.5% of his passes with three touchdowns and three interceptions. You’d love to see the TD to INT ratio improve under duress.

THE REST OF THE OFFENSE

The receiver room is absurd.

Evan Stewart is back after missing last season with an injury. The last time he was fully healthy, he caught 48 passes for 613 yards and five touchdowns. Adding him back to this offense is almost unfair.

Dakorien Moore is back after catching 34 passes for 497 yards and three touchdowns.

Jeremiah McClellan is back after catching 38 passes for 557 yards and three touchdowns.

That is a lot of speed, a lot of skill and a lot of stress for defensive coordinators.

There are not many teams in the country that can match that kind of receiver talent. And when the quarterback is Dante Moore, every coverage decision feels dangerous.

Play too aggressively, and Oregon can beat you over the top.

Sit back, and Moore can pick you apart.

The running back room is not exactly lacking either.

Jordan Davison ran for 667 yards and 15 touchdowns last season. That touchdown number matters. Oregon can move the ball through the air, but Davison gives the Ducks a finisher near the goal line.

Dierre Hill Jr. is also back after rushing for 656 yards and five touchdowns.

That gives Oregon two backs capable of carrying real work.

The offensive line has to replace some pieces, but it has a major anchor in Iapani Laloulu Jr., a Remington finalist at center. That is the kind of player you want leading a reworked group.

Dave Iuli and Teague Ferguson are also part of the projected front, and Oregon has recruited too well for the offensive line to suddenly become a major weakness.

The offense is going to be good.

The only question is whether it is good enough in the biggest games.

Because that is the standard now.

DEFENSE

This defense might be better than the offense.

That sounds strange when the offense has Dante Moore and that receiver room, but it might be true.

Oregon brings back a ridiculous amount of talent on defense, especially up front.

Bear Alexander is back.

Matayo Uiagalelei is back.

A’Mauri Washington is back.

That defensive line has a chance to be one of the best in the country. Maybe the best.

That matters because Oregon was already excellent defensively last season. Opponents averaged only 18.2 points per game and 275 yards per game. They completed just 51.6% of their passes and averaged only 5.5 yards per attempt.

The Ducks allowed just 155 passing yards per game.

That is elite.

And now most of the defense is back.

The linebacker group has Jerry Mixon and Teitum Tuioti. The secondary has Brandon Finney Jr., Aaron Flowers and Ify Obidegwu.

Then Oregon adds Koi Perich from Minnesota, who could step into a huge role in the back end after the loss of Dillon Thieneman.

That is the kind of addition that shows where Oregon is as a program.

The Ducks are not just replacing players.

They are replacing stars with other stars.

This defense has everything it needs to be dominant: pass rush, depth, length, athletes in space and playmakers in the secondary.

If the defensive line is as good as it looks on paper, Oregon is going to be a nightmare.

Because if you cannot block the Ducks up front, you are not going to have enough time to test the secondary.

SCHEDULE

The schedule is challenging, but it is manageable for a team this talented.

Oregon opens with Boise State on Sept. 5. That is not a normal opener. Boise State should expect to be one of the best teams in the new-look Pac-12 and could be a playoff contender.

Then the Ducks go to Oklahoma State on Sept. 12.

Oregon crushed Oklahoma State last year, but this version should be different. The Cowboys brought over a lot from North Texas, including the offensive mind and quarterback that helped that program reach the American title game.

After Portland State, the Ducks go to USC on Sept. 26.

That is the first massive Big Ten test.

After a bye, Oregon hosts UCLA and Nebraska, then goes to Illinois on Oct. 24.

Then comes a huge stretch.

Northwestern comes to Eugene on Halloween, and then Oregon goes to Ohio State on Nov. 7 for one of the biggest games of the season.

That is a national headline game.

A playoff-level game.

Maybe a Big Ten title preview.

After that, Oregon hosts Michigan, goes to Michigan State, and finishes at home against Washington.

The schedule has a few things that stand out.

First, there are no back-to-back road games.

That is big.

Second, the two toughest road games are probably USC and Ohio State, and they are spaced out by more than a month.

Third, the Michigan and Washington games are both at home.

That does not make the schedule easy.

But it does make it manageable for a team that expects to win the Big Ten.

OUTLOOK

Oregon has everything.

That is the honest answer.

The Ducks have a Heisman-level quarterback. They have one of the best receiver rooms in the country. They have two productive running backs. They have a Remington finalist at center. They have a defensive line that could wreck games by itself. They have one of the best returning defenses in the country. They have a coach who has already proven he can win at an elite level.

This is not a “maybe in a year or two” roster.

This is a right-now roster.

The best-case scenario is that Dante Moore becomes the best quarterback in college football, the receivers overwhelm defenses, the run game stays efficient, and the defensive line becomes the best unit in the country.

If that happens, Oregon can win the national championship.

The worst-case scenario is that Moore still has a few turnover issues in the biggest games, the offensive line takes longer to settle than expected, and the road trips to USC and Ohio State keep Oregon from winning the Big Ten.

But even that version is probably still a playoff team.

That is how high the floor is.

Full disclosure: I use AI tools to format my research into an article encompassing all of the information.